How many musicians and audio engineers do you see boasting about the sonic superiority of FLAC audio? Basically none. Not only is it objectively unsupported, it makes you look like kind of an asshole. The reason most audiophiles like FLAC has very little to do with the actual quality of the audio. Errors and irregularities have started popping up, and in the strictly archival sense, the song is now basically worthless as a record of the original.

Your friend loses the digital original, and re-rips the MP3 from the CD to give it to a friend - by now, there is a very noticeable loss in audio quality in the file. That MP3 then gets sent to a friend of yours, who burns it on a CD. Many audiophiles - rightly - love FLAC for this reason.

Roberta Flackįirst, it does everything WAV does lossless audiobut in a much smaller package WAV is extremely inefficient in its use of space. Lossless is the word of the year or last 3 among audiophiles, but the implications of lossless have been twisted and manipulated in ways that are just not factually supported. They spout annoying, misleading drivel that has no basis in reality whatsoever.

Dispatch discography torrent